June 2011, Beijing. 798 Art District in Beijing recently, the number of Ferrari, Harley-Davidson motorcycle owners with a mask through the streets, causing passers-by crowd. Thus lead to the mass consumption of luxury goods for the controversies.
Should not sign
Yuan Yue: levy heavy taxes on luxury goods, not only wrong, but unwise.
First, the luxury goods in the international arena is an open market, once the re-implementation of tax policy, overseas Chinese people will buy, resulting in an outflow of purchasing power. Second, today's market is a multi-layered, different levels of people for different levels of production of the product. The added value is very high luxury, high value-added China should accumulate wealth, rather than low-end industries to earn a hard-earned money. Third, the tax revenue is received from the enterprise state, then assign some way down. Today, the government's tax incentives for a luxury business is difficult, but with the luxury tax to the destroyed several businesses but it is very easy.
China's economy in the aquarium, we can not always keep only those low-end fish. What can we help people to improve social benefits? So, not only for luxury goods should levy heavy taxes, but also to more effective policies to encourage.
Ren Jin: In the luxury goods industry, or a big wave of industrial upgrading in China wants to have positions, there must be taxes taken care of. For high-end industry, we want to encourage, rather than limiting, with a heavy duty to suppress it, it was possible to do well. Then we spread them, so that today's luxuries become tomorrow's mass consumer goods.
The levy
He Gang: a luxury not everyone needed daily necessities, mainly high-income consumer groups, the collection of heavy taxes must not be polite. They are not very sensitive to price in such a "goose" who pluck, they will not call the state of the pull, the more pull it. Moreover, the tax is an important function is to regulate the distribution of income, levy heavy taxes on luxury items, will help finance more money for low-income groups focused on social subsidies, or appropriate transfer.
On consumer will levy heavy taxes on the transfer abroad of the problem in 2009, total sales of luxury goods in China is about 160 billion yuan, of which half is indeed overseas consumption, but there are still nearly 800 million consumers in the domestic a heavy case of consumption tax.
Heavy taxes on luxury goods companies will be destroyed? We should not underestimate the creativity of Chinese entrepreneurs and viability. The result is support for "perennial losers", which in turn allow them to market in the most brutal to compete, but to be the first to come out. Do not even get out to worry about too much. Overall, the luxury goods market economy in the proportion of very small accounts, or even ignored. Tax policy should take care of the overall situation, rather than to a small part of industry and enterprise is not sufficient space for development.
This should not encourage luxury consumption?
April 20, Hainan "tax islands" policy began the trial, luxury welcome blowout. This is the national release of encouraging luxury consumption signal?
This encourages
Zhou Ting: luxury, freedom is always the human pursuit of two gifts, the Chinese luxury goods market as the savior of the world market and encourage consumer responsibility.
Countries have implemented in Hainan, "Islands tax" policy, which is the national release of a signal to gradually reduce import tariffs on luxury goods and adjust the consumption tax, so high-end retail and other retail to the orderly integration, to achieve the healthy development of China market . Countries have seen positive role in guiding luxury, why should we oppose the spending?
Encourage the consumption of luxury goods in China, not saying we have to spend foreign brands, but must also encourage domestic development of luxury brands. Indeed, luxury is a niche product, but we can not ignore it in the market in a leading role.
Yuan Yue: We should encourage the development of the luxury market to go on demand, and should not encourage the use of market-distorting government hand over the demand.
Made in China to really master the high-value, the first people to have a high consumer bit. People contacts and experience of luxury, made him the standard and pattern of consumption will rise. After consumption standards to improve the general public, there is a scale economy, there is a decline in unit cost of space. Consumption of luxury goods is actually the standard of our optimization and landscaping, we should not simply demonize luxury. Luxury like an engine. Although the general public and not consumption, but consumption of high-end consumer-driven mid-range, mid-and low-end pull, high-end consumer demand is the motive.
Hua Xia: Many people are particularly firmly believes that the current China's own luxury brand, this really is not. But I think that this really could have, and this future must be. If China's luxury goods today to draw up, really there is no chance. To the financial crisis is really a very good opportunity of China's brand, the world's raw materials are open to China.
Market is the public to vote with the money, the fair sex. As long as you do well, consumer perception, and have, his future will continue to make the brand heritage. Ye Hao of China's aircraft, yachts Ye Hao, need some influential VIP before consumption, they can spread out the brand experience, this is our most practical to do.
Should not be encouraged
He just: on China's current situation, I am afraid we can not encourage people to consume more luxury goods.
We see, in 2009, China's GDP ranked third in the world, per capita GDP ranking in the 100. Such a transformation of developing country there are many poor people, but the greatest contribution for the foreign luxury market share. This is not an honor but a shame.
In 2009, total consumption of luxury goods in China of about 160 billion yuan, of which the domestic consumption of about 800 billion yuan. That same year, China's social retail sales totaling more than 7 trillion yuan. A mere 7 trillion 80 billion in social spending where it is negligible. If we consume a mere 80 billion policy to encourage this, but few people enjoy the luxury, and forget to encourage more basic consumption growth, such as health, education, and that such a policy is upside down.
For the development of an industry, we may have three kinds of attitudes: first, let it develop normally. Second, to encourage their development. Third, the limit of its development. In China, for luxury, we can tolerate up is allowed to develop normally, not be encouraged.
Should not sign
Yuan Yue: levy heavy taxes on luxury goods, not only wrong, but unwise.
First, the luxury goods in the international arena is an open market, once the re-implementation of tax policy, overseas Chinese people will buy, resulting in an outflow of purchasing power. Second, today's market is a multi-layered, different levels of people for different levels of production of the product. The added value is very high luxury, high value-added China should accumulate wealth, rather than low-end industries to earn a hard-earned money. Third, the tax revenue is received from the enterprise state, then assign some way down. Today, the government's tax incentives for a luxury business is difficult, but with the luxury tax to the destroyed several businesses but it is very easy.
China's economy in the aquarium, we can not always keep only those low-end fish. What can we help people to improve social benefits? So, not only for luxury goods should levy heavy taxes, but also to more effective policies to encourage.
Ren Jin: In the luxury goods industry, or a big wave of industrial upgrading in China wants to have positions, there must be taxes taken care of. For high-end industry, we want to encourage, rather than limiting, with a heavy duty to suppress it, it was possible to do well. Then we spread them, so that today's luxuries become tomorrow's mass consumer goods.
The levy
He Gang: a luxury not everyone needed daily necessities, mainly high-income consumer groups, the collection of heavy taxes must not be polite. They are not very sensitive to price in such a "goose" who pluck, they will not call the state of the pull, the more pull it. Moreover, the tax is an important function is to regulate the distribution of income, levy heavy taxes on luxury items, will help finance more money for low-income groups focused on social subsidies, or appropriate transfer.
On consumer will levy heavy taxes on the transfer abroad of the problem in 2009, total sales of luxury goods in China is about 160 billion yuan, of which half is indeed overseas consumption, but there are still nearly 800 million consumers in the domestic a heavy case of consumption tax.
Will be ruined heavy duty luxury business? We should not underestimate the creativity of Chinese entrepreneurs and viability. The result is support for "perennial losers", which in turn allow them to market in the most brutal to compete, but to be the first to come out. Do not even get out to worry about too much. Overall, the luxury goods market economy in the proportion of very small accounts, or even ignored. Tax policy should take care of the overall situation, rather than to a small part of industry and enterprise is not sufficient space for development.
This should not encourage luxury consumption?
April 20, Hainan "tax islands" policy began the trial, luxury welcome blowout. This is the national release of encouraging luxury consumption signal?
This encourages
Zhou Ting: luxury, freedom is always the human pursuit of two gifts, the Chinese luxury goods market as the savior of the world market and encourage consumer responsibility.
Countries have implemented in Hainan, "Islands tax" policy, which is the national release of a signal to gradually reduce import tariffs on luxury goods and adjust the consumption tax, so high-end retail and other retail to the orderly integration, to achieve the healthy development of China market . Countries have seen positive role in guiding luxury, why should we oppose the spending?
Encourage the consumption of luxury goods in China, not saying we have to spend foreign brands, but must also encourage domestic development of luxury brands. Indeed, luxury is a niche product, but we can not ignore it in the market in a leading role.
Yuan Yue: We should encourage the development of the luxury market to go on demand, and should not encourage the use of market-distorting government hand over the demand.
Made in China to really master the high-value, the first people to have a high consumer bit. People contacts and experience of luxury, made him the standard and pattern of consumption will rise. After consumption standards to improve the general public, there is a scale economy, there is a decline in unit cost of space. Consumption of luxury goods is actually the standard of our optimization and landscaping, we should not simply demonize luxury. Luxury like an engine. Although the general public and not consumption, but consumption of high-end consumer-driven mid-range, mid-and low-end pull, high-end consumer demand is the motive.
Hua Xia: Many people are particularly firmly believes that the current China's own luxury brand, this really is not. But I think that this really could have, and this future must be. If China's luxury goods today to draw up, really there is no chance. To the financial crisis is really a very good opportunity of China's brand, the world's raw materials are open to China.
Market is the public to vote with the money, the fair sex. As long as you do well, consumer perception, and have, his future will continue to make the brand heritage. Ye Hao of China's aircraft, yachts Ye Hao, need some influential VIP before consumption, they can spread out the brand experience, this is our most practical to do.
Should not be encouraged
He just: on China's current situation, I am afraid we can not encourage people to consume more luxury goods.
We see, in 2009, China's GDP ranked third in the world, per capita GDP ranking in the 100. Such a transformation of developing country there are many poor people, but the greatest contribution for the foreign luxury market share. This is not an honor but a shame.
In 2009, total consumption of luxury goods in China of about 160 billion yuan, of which the domestic consumption of about 800 billion yuan. That same year, China's social retail sales totaling more than 7 trillion yuan. A mere 7 trillion 80 billion in social spending where it is negligible. If we consume a mere 80 billion policy to encourage this, but few people enjoy the luxury, and forget to encourage more basic consumption growth, such as health, education, and that such a policy is upside down.
For the development of an industry, we may have three kinds of attitudes: first, let it develop normally. Second, to encourage their development. Third, the limit of its development. In China, for luxury, we can tolerate up is allowed to develop normally, not be encouraged.
No comments:
Post a Comment